Normative questions seek to give an analysis of how things should be done. Therefore, a normative question serves the purpose to defining what the best in a given situation is. On this note, normative questions are likely to be used in political debates. As a result, an argument will be presented for the sake of maintaining a specific change, action, and outcome. For instance, normative questions can be used in determining the relationship between winning elections and money. In this case, the normative question would be whether the candidates that spend more money win more votes? In this way, the analysis will be exploring whether the influence of money in modern campaigns is a threat to making a democratic choice in terms of free and fair elections. In addition, normative questions provide the basis of comparing the current situation and how it is expected to develop. That is, in most cases, they are likely to result in a positive response. Therefore, political analysis should be concerned with normative questions to explore the values and expectations that show how the political world ought to be.
The use of normative questions is very important in political analysis. It helps evaluate and create arguments in relation to whether the situation is right or wrong (Leopold & Stears, 2008). Therefore, normative questions help reveal the relationship between the current situation and political events. As a result, these revelations are necessary to construct general principles in the reality that the political world exists in (Malici & Smith, 2012). However, it is important that political analysts should use normative questions that are not biased, but rather well-substantiated and backed up by empirical evidence. This way, these analysts will be adding more value to objectivity that will help the audience in making political decisions (Bonotti & Bader, 2016). On this note, the use of normative questions in political analysis serves as the cornerstone to understanding the political arena.
On a further note, normative questions are usually based on the facts about the world. Therefore, when used in political analysis, they help to understand the commitment of political leaders to the wellbeing of the community (Bonotti & Bader, 2016). In addition, normative questions identify a clear theme in which political activities are operating. They also serve as an informal way of understanding the motivations of political leaders, their interests and objectives. On this account, the audience will understand the expressive behaviors of political leaders (Malici & Smith, 2012). On the other hand, responses to normative questions provide political analysts with instruments to persuade other people to agree or oppose particular views and opinions. For example, an analyst can use a normative question to get views on voting in a mass election. In this case, the analyst will get views on reasons for either voting or not voting (Leopold & Stears, 2008). At the same time, some individuals will express opinions that they will vote only for politicians that will bring positive change to the society.
Additionally, political analysis should be concerned with normative questions because they can be used to spearhead revolutions in political institutions. First, formative questions are concerned with what should be done; therefore, they can be used when focusing on policies and governmental interventions in a particular issue (Leopold & Stears, 2008). Second, they can be used by the public to criticize those policies that they do not understand well, especially the political ones. As a consequence, it will be challenging for a particular set of institutional rules to be implemented effectively when they are being criticized by the public (Malici & Smith, 2012). This means political analysts should be concerned with normative questions because they are used as a powerful tool to oppose specific policies.
Limited time Offer
Normative questions create the framework for evaluating alternatives for some political states. They create a moral obligation to depict the relationship between power and interests in the political field (Hay, 2002). They tend to express the preference and commitment for particular moral principles that are ideal in a given context. Therefore, when used for political analysis, normative questions mean that something should be done to produce the desired outcome (Bonotti & Bader, 2016). More interestingly, normative questions are concerned with laws and conditions that can be altered. For instance, they help in examining whether an action is morally right or wrong and then propose the right course (Leopold & Stears, 2008). In this way, they create a method for distinguishing between higher and lower values.
Notably, normative questions relate to norms and standards. This means that political analysis should be concerned with analyzing issues in adherence to certain standards and rules. Therefore, the analysis should have the objective of evaluating the norms that will determine their credibility and acceptability by the audience (Bonotti & Bader, 2016). In other words, normative questions foster the realization of certain values and principles. For example, rather than asking how economic policies are made, the analyst should ask how they ought to be made. On this note, they are crucial in examining sets of principles, their characteristics, and implications (Malici & Smith, 2012). As a result, those principles that may be ignored ought to be implemented. Furthermore, normative questions ensure that principles that constitute a central idea of political analysis are articulated well to be acceptable to the majority (Leopold & Stears, 2008). For instance, when policy makers formulate a certain policy, they must foresee the extent to which the policy will produce the desired outcome.
Political analysis should be concerned with normative questions. These are question that scan the nature of policies, decisions, and the functions of the authority (Bonotti & Bader, 2016). On one hand, the members of political organizations want the authority to act in a manner that will help them achieve their political desires. On the other hand, the authority must act accordingly to maintain the welfare of the state. Therefore, the authority must act to meet the expectations of being good (Leopold & Stears, 2008). In this account, the normative questions establish a sense of responsibility. This means that there are certain principles and norms that political analysis must put forward. As a consequence, it will become easier for people to judge the success or failure of authorities (Malici & Smith, 2012). Therefore, a political analyst should be concerned with normative questions because they provide an easy way of allocating responsibilities.
On a further note, normative questions require that norms and principles that are valuable must be applied in determining and implementing policies. On this note, the political analysis must follow these norms (Leopold & Stears, 2008). Second, any bias expressed in political analysis will plague its proper functioning in articulating the general welfare of the state. Therefore, in order to create a balance in political analysis, normative questions come in handy to ensure that the acceptable ideals are not ignored (Malici & Smith, 2012). Furthermore, although norms and values are subject to changes, normative questions ensure that political analyst takes these changes into account and acts accordingly. They create an approach that makes an emphasis on giving priority to important values that are essential for political analysis (Bonotti & Bader, 2016). For instance, political analysts must be keen to ensure that the outcome of their analysis will not draw negative criticism from followers. Rather, the use of normative questions should enhance the analysis in creating the awareness among the public about the state of political activities (Hay, 2002). This way, they will depict the reality of social and political situation.
Benefit from Our Service: Save 25% Along with the first order offer - 15% discount, you save extra 10% since we provide 300 words/page instead of 275 words/page
Notably, political analysis should be concerned with normative questions because they demonstrate that political leaders have more functions in addition to maintaining law and order. They are supposed to perform other responsibilities that will enhance the overall health of society (Malici & Smith, 2012). It should be emphasized that political leadership has a dynamic role to make continuous efforts to improve the ideal values and norms. Therefore, it means that when normative questions are ignored in political analysis, there is a room for conflicts to arise between political leaders and state (Leopold & Stears, 2008). For instance, there will be a degradation of moral values that will be evident through vices such as corruption. In addition, normative questions are significant in showcasing the state of political power. That is, the negative forms that political leaders used to become influential (Bonotti & Bader, 2016). These are forms such as coercion and bribery of voters to acquire respect and political position.
Another reason why political analysts should be concerned with normative questions is their ability to create an understanding on various forms of political actions. They depict acceptable morals in society that form the basis for political actions (Hay, 2002). For instance, justice is one of the values that political analysts should explore deeply. In this way, it will be easier to identify those leaders that are not just doing the minimum of their political duties (Bonotti & Bader, 2016). Therefore, normative questions will help in establishing a good political order. They create an outline of what political activities are supposed to be and the consequences of failing to adhere to the acceptable values within society (Malici & Smith, 2012). For example, when the political analysis is on the issue of war as the major theme, then the normative questions would explain whether war is justified as a way of resolving internal and international disputes (Leopold & Stears, 2008).
Normative questions give insights into political institutions and the scope of their operation. This is a concern of political analysis, because political leaders will come under scrutiny as their followers want to know the legitimacy of their political activities (Bhargava & Acharya, 2008). Moreover, political activities are concerned with enforcing governmental policies that relate to economic and social policies. Therefore, when normative questions are ignored in political analysis, the followers will not understand the recognized structures of the government that provide representation for people (Hay, 2002). For example, people will not be educated on the fact that trade unions can be used as a tool for articulating their grievances in the economic field. Therefore, political analysis should be concerned with normative questions because they serve as a modern approach to examining and understanding political institutions. This means that issues such as violence and revolutions that are influenced by politics will not be ignored (Leopold & Stears, 2008). Additionally, the analysis will not overlook the influence of informal groups on politics without causing an ethical issue.
Top 10 writers
Your order will be assigned to the most experienced writer in the relevant discipline. The highly demanded expert, one of our top-10 writers with the highest rate among the customers
A key concern of normative questions is identifying what constitutes utterances and texts across political spectrum. It is common for political analysis to be focused on social values that are reflected by politics (Malici & Smith, 2012). This means that the normative questions will revolve around the acceptance and justification as sought by political activities in their existing procedures. On this note, those involved in any political analysis should be keen to use the political language that will mobilize support (Bhargava & Acharya, 2008). Notably, this support is crucial to fuel a political system that runs and involves dialogue between political leaders and their followers. Moreover, in its application, normative questions will enhance the challenging of political ideas and systems that compromise the wellbeing of society (Bonotti & Bader, 2016). In other words, political analysis should be concerned with the fact that normative questions play a significant role in determining how political duties are discharged. They will help to unveil the levels of complexities and diverse forms in which political decisions occur either verbally or in a written form (Hay, 2002). In this way, people will have a vast knowledge of what political thoughts and ideas mean.
VIP support ensures that your enquiries will be answered immediately by our Support Team. Extra attention is guaranteed.
On a further note, normative questions challenge the misconception that the negativities in the political world cannot be studied well. The response serves as an investigation to analyze normal political thinking in relation to processes, activities, and decision making (Bonotti & Bader, 2016). In other words, the normative approach to political analysis promotes a rational argument in which decisions should be made. In this way, political analysts will facilitate their analysis with propositions that most people can endorse. For instance, the majority would support that the political forces should help them in living a decent life (Malici & Smith, 2012). Therefore, the concern of normative questions in this case would be whether the politicians are concerned with the wellbeing of the populations. On this account, normative questions in political analysis will try to explain the reason why a certain point of view must be adopted, or why some actions are more necessary than others (Bhargava & Acharya, 2008). However, no matter the reasons, the fundamental idea is to ensure that the analysis is aimed at enhancing moral values and transparency.
On a different perspective, normative questions have a distinct ability to create a mutual understanding and common agreement. They help the society to understand that, although there is some illegitimacy in the society, effective communication is important to build a nation that is comprised of people from diverse backgrounds (Bonotti & Bader, 2016). Thus, the analysts should be concerned in their analysis with fostering conceptual clarity that will lead to better communication between people and their leaders. Therefore, although the analysis will be argumentative, it creates a forum in which the morals of the society will be discussed, resolved, and maintained effectively (Hay, 2002). For instance, leaders and their followers will be able to reach a consensus on what policies and decisions should be initiated to maintain the health of the society at large. This is to say that normative questions offer some hope towards a possible solution to some of the most significant differences that remain between political leaders and the population (Malici & Smith, 2012). They create a space where reasons are offered, challenged, and endorsed. More importantly, responses to normative questions foster a need for immediacy. That is, the issues that are addressed should not be taken for granted; instead, they should be resolved quickly (Leopold & Stears, 2008). In this way, these responses will serve as a tool for creating general understanding and prescribing of issues that are crucial in modern societies. For example, normative questions explain how power is exercised and how it should be used to deal with issues such as corruption and nepotism (Hay, 2002).
There is another reason why political analysis should be concerned with normative questions: they seek to ensure that there is neutrality when formulating and endorsing political decisions. Consequently, it means that there is a need to identify the good practices that are embedded in a particular process (Bhargava & Acharya, 2008). In this way, the obstruction to the proper understanding of underlying values will be minimized. Therefore, as people begin to understand the acceptable values and principles, a change of stance towards them becomes mandatory (Leopold & Stears, 2008). When this is done, both the leaders and the people will gain an awareness of the objectivity of some practices that makes them more relevant than others in the society. For example, all recommendations for adopting certain policies and taking particular actions should lead to a positive outcome (Bonotti & Bader, 2016). Hence, to avoid confusion in political analysis, normative questions come in handy to demonstrate the relationship between facts, concepts, and values. They provide guidance that allows political analysts to engage in moral reflection based on shared opinions and views (Bhargava & Acharya, 2008). On that account, it creates the tasks of getting things done in the right way.
for more than
for more than
for more than
On a further note, most political analysis takes a casual form. However, political analysts should be concerned with normative questions because they give a description on what is going on, especially in the political world (Malici & Smith, 2012). For instance, by asking about the proportion of voters who would vote as republicans or democrats, the analyst will be analyzing the voting patterns and preferences in a particular state. On the other hand, the normative questions in political analysis have some challenges that the analysts should be concerned with (Leopold & Stears, 2008). In particular, normative framing requires a commitment to the practice of particular norms. Therefore, it may be challenging when seeking to uncover some underlying claims about a particular political issue (Bonotti & Bader, 2016). It is even more challenging because normative questions take on a comparative form when considering the relationship between politics and social values. Moreover, norms are subject to critique, making it even harder to adhere to a certain set of rules that configure a relationship between ethics and politics (Bhargava & Acharya, 2008).
In conclusion, normative questions are likely to be used in political debates because they serve the purpose of defining what the best in a given situation is. Normative questions seek to give an analysis of how things should be done. On this note, political analysis should be concerned with normative questions because they demonstrate how things ought to be in the political world. First, they help to understand the commitment of political leaders to the wellbeing of the community. Second, they seek to ensure that there is neutrality when formulating and endorsing political decisions. Another reason for concern is the ability of the normative questions to create mutual understanding and common agreement. In this way, they challenge the misconception that the negativities in the political world cannot be studied well. In this sense, when normative questions are used for political analysis, it promotes a rational argument following which decisions should be made. This means that political analysts will facilitate their analysis with propositions that most people can endorse. In addition, because normative questions relate to norms and standards, political analysis should be concerned with analyzing issues in adherence to certain standards and rules. In this way, the analysis will meet the objective of evaluating those norms that will determine the credibility and acceptability by an audience.